Previous
Next

Wednesday, 25 March 2026

NANS Presidency Aspirant Pays Pupils’ Fees, Donates Uniforms In Akure On Birthday

NANS Presidency Aspirant Pays Pupils’ Fees, Donates Uniforms In Akure On Birthday


A student leader and aspirant for the office of President of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), Akinteye Babatunde Afeez, popularly known as BABTEE, has marked his birthday with an education support initiative for primary school pupils in Akure, the Ondo State capital.

As part of the outreach, the student activist paid the school fees of selected pupils in a number of primary schools and also provided them with new school uniforms, sandals and school bags.
Akinteye, in a statement made available to journalists on Wednesday, said the gesture was inspired by his desire to give back to society and support the growth of basic education.

Quoting former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, he said, “We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give,” adding that he considered it appropriate to use the occasion of his birthday to invest in the future of children through education.
According to him, education remains the foundation upon which nations rise and thrive, stressing that every child deserves a solid start in life through access to quality primary education.

He noted that Ondo State, which he described as the cradle of his student leadership journey, holds a special place in his heart, hence his decision to celebrate the occasion in Akure.
The NANS presidency hopeful said his choice to carry out the intervention in the state capital was also in line with his commitment to educational development as he prepares for what he described as the apex and distinguished office of NANS President.

Afeez explained that the initiative focused on easing the burden on parents while encouraging pupils to remain committed to their studies.

He said primary education is the cornerstone of opportunity and urged stakeholders at all levels to invest more in the sector, noting that education sharpens minds, shapes destinies and helps build a society founded on strong values.
He expressed gratitude to God for the grace to impact lives, describing the outreach as the beginning of a broader mission to make meaningful and lasting contributions to society.

The schools that benefited from the gesture include St. Francis Primary School, Akure; St. Martin’s RCM Primary School, Akure; Ebenezer A/C Primary School, Akure; St. Stephen’s Anglican Primary School, Ijomu, Akure; and Muslim Primary School, Akure.

Afeez, who styles himself as “The Harbinger of The Blessed Era,” said the intervention marks the beginning of what he hopes will become a sustained commitment to supporting education and impacting lives across communities.
He added that nothing would discourage him from pursuing causes that create lasting value and leave what he described as “an impact for eternity.”
Baruwa Camp Alleges Security Agencies Defied Court To Restore MC Oluomo

Baruwa Camp Alleges Security Agencies Defied Court To Restore MC Oluomo



The leadership crisis rocking the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW) took a fresh twist on Wednesday as the camp of Comrade Tajudeen Ibikunle Baruwa accused security agencies of defying valid court judgments by restoring Musiliu Akinsanya, popularly known as MC Oluomo, to the union’s national secretariat in Abuja.

At a press briefing in the Federal Capital Territory, counsel to Baruwa, Tolu Babaleye Esq., alleged that the Nigeria Police Force, with the support of the Nigerian Army, the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and other security formations, acted in open disregard of subsisting court rulings affirming Baruwa as the authentic National President of the union.

The lawyers described the development as a grave assault on the judiciary, the rule of law and democratic order, insisting that what began as an internal union dispute has now degenerated into a constitutional crisis.

According to Babaleye, Baruwa emerged as the duly elected and nationally recognised leader of the NURTW through a lawful electoral process and subsequently secured landmark victories at both the National Industrial Court and the Court of Appeal.

He said the judgments clearly affirmed Baruwa’s leadership and left no room for ambiguity, stressing that they were binding judicial pronouncements and not mere recommendations.

Public reports had earlier confirmed that the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, in November 2024, upheld the earlier decision of the National Industrial Court recognising Baruwa as the legitimate NURTW President and nullifying the emergence of MC Oluomo as national leader of the union. The appellate court was also reported to have dismissed the appeal challenging Baruwa’s leadership and awarded costs against the appellants.

Despite the court victories, Baruwa’s legal team alleged that repeated efforts to compel the enforcement of the judgments were frustrated by state authorities.

Babaleye told journalists that formal letters were written to the Nigeria Police Force and other relevant security agencies demanding compliance with the court orders, but the requests were allegedly ignored.

He added that the matter was later escalated to the Honourable Minister of Labour and the Attorney General of the Federation, with appeals for the executive to give effect to the judgments. While the Minister of Labour reportedly convened the parties, the Baruwa camp claimed the issue was eventually referred for legal advice, a step it described as a delay tactic that emboldened those allegedly acting in defiance of the courts.

According to the legal team, after waiting for over two and a half years without enforcement of the judgments, Baruwa on Monday, March 23, 2026, moved into the NURTW national office in Abuja and peacefully assumed control of the secretariat.

They maintained that there was no violence, no resistance and no breach of peace, insisting that the move was a lawful assertion of rights by a man armed with valid and subsisting judgments.

However, the lawyers alleged that the police, which had failed to act on the judgments for months, suddenly surfaced, not to remove the alleged illegal occupants of the office, but to arrest Baruwa himself.

Babaleye said Baruwa was subsequently charged with public disturbance, a move he described as baseless and legally indefensible.

The legal team further alleged that the situation escalated on Tuesday, March 24, 2026, when security operatives removed Baruwa from the office and later escorted MC Oluomo into the NURTW national secretariat under heavy security protection.

Describing the development as the ultimate indignity, Babaleye argued that MC Oluomo was neither a contestant in the election that produced Baruwa nor a party to the litigation that culminated in the appellate court judgment.

He said the action amounted to a coordinated, military style operation designed to undermine the judiciary and perpetuate an illegal occupation of the union’s national headquarters.

Babaleye told reporters that the tragedy deepened when security agencies led by the police and supported by the Army, Civil Defence and others marched Ayinde Akinsanya, also known as MC Oluomo, into the NURTW national office.

He insisted that the development was not merely contempt by private individuals, but a direct institutional desecration of the judicial process.

According to him, when security agencies begin to choose which court orders to obey and which to ignore, the country ceases to operate under the rule of law and slips into the rule of force.

The Baruwa camp also challenged the Federal Government to act decisively, saying the latest events amount to a major test of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s oft stated commitment to democracy and the rule of law.

Babaleye called on the President to immediately direct the Inspector General of Police to restore Baruwa to office, arrest those allegedly occupying the secretariat unlawfully, and order a full scale investigation into the role played by the police, military and other agencies in the March 24 operation.

He also urged the President to publicly demonstrate through concrete action that no individual, regardless of political influence or connection, is above the Constitution.

The lawyers further called on the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), the National Judicial Council (NJC), civil society groups and all defenders of democracy to speak out against what they termed a dangerous descent into lawlessness.

As of the time of filing this report, there was no official response from the Nigeria Police Force, the Nigerian Army, the NSCDC, the Federal Ministry of Labour, or the office of the Attorney General of the Federation on the allegations.

Likewise, there was no immediate reaction from MC Oluomo or his associates on the claims made by Baruwa’s camp.

The latest development marks yet another dramatic chapter in the protracted NURTW leadership tussle, which has been characterised by rival claims, litigation and political controversy.

In March 2024, the National Industrial Court affirmed Baruwa as NURTW President and disbanded the caretaker structure challenging his authority, before the Court of Appeal in November 2024 upheld that decision.

With the fresh allegations of state backed interference now in the open, the Baruwa camp says it will pursue all legal and constitutional avenues to reclaim the union’s national secretariat and ensure full compliance with the judgments already delivered in its favour.

Tuesday, 24 March 2026

Court Returns Sowore’s Passport After Controversial Twist In Cybercrime Suit

Court Returns Sowore’s Passport After Controversial Twist In Cybercrime Suit



Human rights activist and former presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, on Tuesday accused top officials of the Nigeria Police Force of orchestrating a fresh legal plot to revive a cybercrime case earlier struck out by the Federal High Court in Abuja, in what he described as a disturbing abuse of judicial process.

Sowore made the allegation after proceedings before Justice Musa Liman, where he said a series of unusual legal maneuvers unfolded around the cybercrime charge initially filed against him by the police.

According to Sowore, the case had earlier been struck out by the court. However, rather than allow the matter to rest, he alleged that a fresh ex parte motion was subsequently filed by police officials to relist the same case for trial.

He specifically named the former Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, ACP Bukola Kuti, and AIG Emmanuel Ade Aina, the officer in charge of the Police Legal Directorate, as those behind what he termed an “astonishing” attempt to reopen the matter.

Describing the day’s events as “revealing and deeply troubling,” Sowore alleged that despite Egbetokun’s removal from office, the former police chief still appeared to be exercising influence within the police hierarchy.

His legal team, led by Barrister Marshal D. F. Abubakar and Barrister Rosemary Hamza of Adeyanju Deji’s chambers, was said to have immediately applied for the Certified True Copy of the ruling and final order striking out the case. However, Sowore claimed court officials delayed the process, citing the public holiday.

At the centre of the dispute was also the release of Sowore’s international passport and the land documentation of his surety, both of which had been deposited as part of the bail conditions imposed on him since January 2025.

Sowore said repeated applications for the release of the passport were resisted, adding that Justice Liman at one point allegedly suggested that his wife and family members would need to swear affidavits before the travel document could be returned.

He further alleged that the case itself had suffered several deliberate adjournments over the months, often on the grounds of the judge’s conferences and other official engagements.

According to him, recent events now cast those repeated delays in a different light.

He disclosed that last week, the police legal directorate filed what he described as an unusual ex parte motion to relist the struck-out case. On Tuesday, he said the court registrar informed his lawyers that Justice Liman would not formally sign the ruling and order striking out the matter until the police appeared to move their application to relist the case and also withdraw it in open court.

In what he described as a further contradiction, Sowore said the police later filed yet another ex parte application seeking to withdraw their earlier motion to relist the matter.

While he and his lawyers waited for proceedings to begin, Sowore said they were suddenly informed that the case was not listed for hearing, even though, according to him, the pending application to relist ought not to have affected their request to obtain the ruling and order already delivered.

During the period of waiting, Sowore said he addressed journalists at the court premises on what he called “a range of national issues.”

He also recounted a dramatic moment during the media interaction, alleging that a Senior Advocate of Nigeria identified as Musbau, SAN, abruptly interrupted the session and attempted to intimidate both him and journalists at the court complex, asking them to vacate the courtroom area.

Sowore said he thereafter left the court premises for another engagement at the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in Abuja.

However, upon concluding that meeting, he said his lawyers informed him that Justice Liman had gone ahead to relist the matter, allowed a police lawyer to move the application, and then, in what he described as an ironic turn, brought the entire case to an end by granting an ex parte order permitting the police to withdraw it.

He maintained that the process was irregular and contradictory, arguing that a matter already struck out should not have been relisted only to be withdrawn moments later.

Despite the controversy, Sowore confirmed that his international passport was eventually released to his lawyer and returned to him, bringing to a close what he described as a prolonged and unjustified seizure.

As of the time of filing this report, there was no official response from the Nigeria Police Force, the court, or the officers named by Sowore over the allegations surrounding the attempted relisting of the case, the withdrawal application, and the eventual release of his travel documents.

The development marks yet another chapter in Sowore’s long-running legal and political confrontations with state authorities, with the activist insisting that the latest events further expose what he sees as a sustained misuse of the justice system against dissenting voices.